Question styles

Agree/Disagree

pair views

Multiple choices

Good idea

Grading the Four Dimensions:

  1. Topic 切题
  2. Development 行文具体性
  3. Unity 段落与全文具有逻辑一致性
  4. Language 语言

Key elements

  • Word count 450
  • Four or Five paragraph
  • Formal (academic) style
  • Natural expression, appropriate vocabulary, and variety in grammar

五段式 Writing Structure

  1. The beginning
  2. Point 1 with reasoning 说理
  3. Point 2 with exemplification 例证
  4. Point 3 with concession 让步
  5. The end(时间紧迫可以不写)

Prompt Analysis

一般情况下选择“一边倒”的观点

储备宏观 Macro & Expandable 的观点

image-20230304152223903

Brainstorming

Opening

A GOOD Opening is Intriguing, coherent, and clear 引人入胜,流畅一致,清晰

Response 立场-> Points -> Detail

在开头先用detail引出对方立场,然后转折指出存在一定问题,最后述明自己的观点

Use Formula

image-20230307120158741

Reasoning

Coherent: from High level all the down to details

Adequate: 论理充分

Consistent: 一致性

Also, Formula!

image-20230307120240116

怎么写更多的Fact来填充?

  1. 进一步解释,进一步Follow; Furthermore

  2. $\color{red} {Fight} $, 驳斥反方的观点

  3. Follow & Fight; 混合型

  4. Optional Filler 字数填充:Summary、what if ? 、、、

Exemplification

Agian, Formula!

image-20230307120411859
  1. 观点表达明确
  2. 复述例子
  3. 用较复杂的语法句式(虚拟语气)

Generality!

Concession & Ending

also, focus on Formula

image-20230307120447608

use technics in Reasoning to be Adequate

The End is optional!

End is also Formula

image-20230307120516793

polish this essay template by refine it’s wording:

It is hard to deny that (opposite point), and such a fact leads impressionable people to generate the opinion that (opposite opinion). However, such a statement suffers from both logical and factual fallacies, and it should be examined meticulously.

As far as (Point 1), (Point 2), and (Point3) are concerned, I strongly hold that (your opinion).

First and foremost, (Point 1), as (Fact 1). Meanwhile, (Fact2). Not to mention that (Fact3).

Furthermore, the fact that (point 2 mid level) indicates that (point 2 high level). Take the case of (character), who / which (process ). As a result, (result).

Nevertheless, a voice arises that (opposite detail in grand opening). Ironically, (facts against opposite detail). Therefore, (Point 3).

In a nutshell, I maintain that (Your Response Paraphrase). Admittedly, as my favorite quote from ( A famous person) goes, (Famous person says), and some people may oppose me. However, I believe they will compromise after being exposed to my article.


It is difficult to refute the (opposite point) as it can lead impressionable individuals to form the view that (opposite opinion). However, such a claim is fraught with logical and factual inconsistencies, and it warrants careful examination.

Regarding (Point 1), (Point 2), and (Point 3), I firmly assert that (your opinion).

To begin with, (Point 1) is supported by (Fact 1), and further reinforced by (Fact 2) and (Fact 3).

Additionally, (point 2 mid level) points to (point 2 high level). For instance, (character) exemplifies this concept through their (process), resulting in (result).

Despite this, a counterargument asserts that (opposite detail in grand opening). Ironically, (facts against opposite detail) reinforce (Point 3).

In summary, I maintain that (Your Response Paraphrase). While some may oppose me, I am reminded of (Famous person’s quote) that states (Famous person says). I am confident that after reading my article, skeptics will see the merit in my argument.


It cannot be denied that (opposite point), and this can easily sway the opinions of impressionable individuals to adopt the stance of (opposite opinion). However, this statement is riddled with logical and factual flaws, and requires a thorough analysis.

As for (Point 1), (Point 2), and (Point 3), I staunchly advocate for (your opinion).

Let’s start with (Point 1), which is supported by (Fact 1), and fortified by (Fact 2) and (Fact 3).

Moreover, (point 2 mid level) clearly illustrates (point 2 high level), as exemplified by (character) who flawlessly executed (process), leading to (result).

Despite this, there is a dissenting voice that argues for (opposite detail in grand opening). The irony, however, is that (facts against opposite detail) only lend further credence to (Point 3).

In summary, I firmly uphold (Your Response Paraphrase), and in the words of (A Famous person), (insert quote ). It is possible that some may still disagree, but I am confident that my article will sway their opinion in my direction.

Gottlob Frege